Mario Morino is one of the smartest people working in "new" philanthropy these days, and this week he provides a somewhat delayed but interesting take on Warren Buffett's decision to give his fortune to the Gates Foundation.
Since Warren Buffett announced plans to give a large portion of his wealth to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, countless analysis and commentaries, both favorable and unfavorable, have been offered. The wide range of comments, criticisms, and postulations clearly illustrates that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder.”
To me, however, it is a much less complicated deed than most have suggested. Buffet’s action, at least on the surface, appears to be consistent with a man who has made well-grounded, common sense decisions in amassing his wealth over the years. Let me quickly qualify that the comments that follow are pure conjecture, as I’ve not met either person nor been privy to their views or thinking.
To me, the beauty and value lie in the clear focus and sheer simplicity of the action. And, Buffett has set a path for others to consider, regardless of the size of the donation.
Morino was himself a technology entrepreneur who made his fortune early in life and has bene dedicating himself to various philanthropic investments ever since. In analyzing the Buffett gift, Morino focuses on what Gates will do. For one, he hopes it will continue to take big risks and not aim to play it safe. He also worries about the costs of spending the money:
I hope the Foundation will not rush to build up the organization in
order to “move the money” required for annual distribution and instead
stay focused on wise philanthropic investing. The reality is that the
type of talent the Foundation needs to bring onboard is scarce and the
price of getting the wrong talent is steep. The private sector world of
investing has shown how difficult it is to scale a venture capital or
private equity firm to go from investing $500 million to $1 billion
annually (comparable to Buffett’s gift which in some sense more than
doubled the Foundation’s “philanthropic investment capital”). Staying
with large investments of capital into several, very important
initiatives is one way to help smooth this difficult transition.
His last point is perhaps his best: there's a troubling trend of governments giving up their responsibilities to private entities, including philanthropies. The sheer size of Gates eclipses what many governments can spend.
Recent Comments